Skip to content
CMDB Alternatives Compare

OPTION · RECONCILE AND SYNC · RANK 6 OF 9

JupiterOne review: the clearest asset ownership model, without CMDB write-back

SHORT ANSWER

JupiterOne ranks 6 of 9 at 67.8 out of 100. It leads ownership mapping because owners are modelled in its security graph, and it publishes annual prices. Writing the record back into a CMDB is not documented, which costs it on sync.

By The Record Desk · CMDB Alternatives Compare · Published 2026-10-11

RECORD SCORE

JupiterOne is outscored on 5 of 7 criteria.

Company
JupiterOne
Type
Reconcile and sync
Deployment
SaaS with API integrations.
Pricing
Small-Market $25,000 a year; Mid-Market $50,000 per 12 months up to 200,000 data points; Enterprise $100,000 per 12 months up to 400,000 data points; custom above 1M data points. No free tier or trial mentioned.

Source: JupiterOne pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026

Website
jupiterone.com

What does JupiterOne do?

A security graph that builds asset relationships, including owners, from 200+ integrations and answers questions in natural language, with published prices.

  • Model: A security graph with natural language queries, a pre-built query library and blast radius views.

    Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • Asset classes: Devices, Users, Networks, Applications, Data, Code repos, Projects, Security controls, Threats, Owners.

    Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • Integrations: "200+ pre-built security integrations".

    Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • Pricing basis: "Pricing is based on the number of datapoints in your environment and the length of your subscription".

    Source: JupiterOne pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • May 2026 launch: A tool that maps how AI agents, cloud resources and identities connect, and Unified Vulnerability Management, which deduplicates findings across tools; both built on the graph.

    Source: JupiterOne announcement, 13 May 2026 · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • ServiceNow: The ServiceNow integration ingests ServiceNow resources, including selected CMDB classes, into the graph for queries and alerts.

    Source: JupiterOne docs: ServiceNow integration · Read 11 Oct 2026

How does it score on each criterion?

JupiterOne: score per criterion, with reason and source
CriterionWeightScoreWhySource
Completeness of discovery20%200+ integrations across devices, users, networks, applications, data and code repos; OT and IoT are not listed.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Data trust and reconciliation20%A security graph maps relationships between assets; entity matching depends on what each integration supplies.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Ownership mapping12%
Highest in set
Owners are one of the asset classes the graph models, so ownership is queryable beside devices and users.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Keeping the CMDB in sync16%
Lowest in set
Its ServiceNow integration doc describes ingesting CMDB classes into the graph; writing records back into the CMDB is not stated there.

Source: JupiterOne docs: ServiceNow integration · Read 11 Oct 2026

Effort to maintain14%SaaS with API integrations; sync frequency is not published and coverage depends on how many integrations are configured.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Actionability10%Alerts and notifications are documented; write-back actions into other systems are not.

Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

Pricing clarity8%
Highest in set
Annual list prices published: $25,000, $50,000 and $100,000 tiers by data points.

Source: JupiterOne pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026

What does its record card show?

JupiterOne record cardFOUND: Documented; MATCHED: Partial; OWNED: Documented; SYNCED: Not documented; CURRENT: Partial. 3 of 5 lines documented.JupiterOneRECONCILE AND SYNCFOUNDDOCMATCHEDPARTOWNEDDOCSYNCEDNOT DOCCURRENTPART3 of 5 lines documented
  • Documented on the vendor's pages
  • Partial: in general terms, through another product or by integration only
  • Not documented on the pages reviewed
  • FOUND · Documented

    Assets enter the graph through 200+ integrations; OT and IoT are not listed.

    Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • MATCHED · Partial

    The graph maps relationships; entity matching depends on what each integration supplies.

    Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • OWNED · Documented

    Owners are an asset class in the graph.

    Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

  • SYNCED · Not documented

    The ServiceNow integration doc describes ingesting CMDB classes; writing records back is not stated there.

    Source: JupiterOne docs: ServiceNow integration · Read 11 Oct 2026

  • CURRENT · Partial

    Integration syncs keep the graph current; frequency is not published.

    Source: JupiterOne platform · Read 27 Sep 2026

A punched line means the vendor's own pages describe that part of keeping a record current. It does not measure how well it works on your estate.

How does it keep the record current?

JupiterOne builds a security graph from more than 200 integrations and models devices, users, networks, applications, data, code repositories and owners as entities with relationships. Integration syncs keep it current; the sync frequency is not published.

How does it work with a CMDB such as ServiceNow?

JupiterOne's ServiceNow integration doc describes ingesting ServiceNow CMDB classes into the graph to query and alert on. Writing records back into the CMDB is not stated on that page, so a team using JupiterOne beside ServiceNow would answer ownership and relationship questions in JupiterOne and update the CMDB through other means.

Where is it strong, and where are its limits?

Strengths

  • The clearest ownership model in this set: owners are first-class entities in the graph.
  • Published annual list prices by data points.

Limits

  • Writing records back into a CMDB is not stated in its ServiceNow integration doc, so the record does not flow back to ServiceNow on its own.
  • Alerts are documented; workflow actions in other systems are not.

How does it compare with the others?

Alternatives to JupiterOneCompare JupiterOne with others

Visit JupiterOne

Frequently asked questions

How much does JupiterOne cost?

Published annual tiers: Small-Market $25,000, Mid-Market $50,000 up to 200,000 data points, Enterprise $100,000 up to 400,000 data points, custom above 1 million. No free tier or trial is mentioned.

What is a data point?

The unit JupiterOne prices on. Its pricing page says pricing is based on the number of data points in an environment and the length of the subscription.

Why does JupiterOne lead ownership mapping?

Owners are one of the asset classes its graph models, so who owns an asset can be queried beside devices and users. It scores 84.